The Christian Science Monitor is reporting that, "Atheists challenge the religious right". Once you get past the challenging headline (atheist is such a dirty word in America!), it's pretty interesting reading. "Seven organizations of nontheists - including atheists, freethinkers, humanists, and agnostics - began the Secular Coalition for America (SCA), a lobby seeking to increase the visibility and respectability of nontheistic viewpoints in the United States." I like their central position: We affirm the secular form of government as a necessary condition for the interdependent rights of religious freedom and religious dissent.
As for company....
A 2006 survey by The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life asked, "What is your religious preference?" and 11% responded, "No religion, not a believer, atheist, agnostic." While 56% responded as Protestant and 23% as Roman Catholics, other categories (Jewish, Mormon, Orthodox Greek or Russian, Islam/Muslim, and other religions) totaled 8%. That means that in the United States there are more atheists and agnostics than there are Jews, Presbyterians, Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and Roman and Greek Orthodox combined. I need a bigger sandbox.
Occasionally I have to remind myself, and others when they ask, of just what a secular humanist is. Wikipedia has a good summary of the tenets:
Secular humanism describes a world view with the following elements and principles:
Need to test beliefs - A conviction that dogmas, ideologies and traditions, whether religious, political or social, must be weighed and tested by each individual and not simply accepted on faith.
Reason, evidence, scientific method - Commitment to the use of critical reason, factual evidence, and scientific methods of inquiry, rather than faith and mysticism, in seeking solutions to human problems and answers to important human questions.
Fulfillment, growth, creativity - A primary concern with fulfillment, growth, and creativity for both the individual and humankind in general.
Search for truth - A constant search for objective truth, with the understanding that new knowledge and experience constantly alter our imperfect perception of it.
This life - A concern for this life and a commitment to making it meaningful through better understanding of ourselves, our history, our intellectual and artistic achievements, and the outlooks of those who differ from us.
Ethics - A search for viable individual, social and political principles of ethical conduct, judging them on their ability to enhance human well-being and individual responsibility.
Building a better world - A conviction that with reason, an open exchange of ideas, good will, and tolerance, progress can be made in building a better world for ourselves and our children.
So what do you think would happen if the majority of the U.S. population suddently became secular humanists? I think we'd create a better world. I think it's quite possibly the only path that can save our world.
Further "Dangerous Readings"
And finally...a blog that made me think of Andy again: "No matter how cynical you become, it's impossible to keep up"
5 comments:
nice read. I am agnostic. I need proof before I believe in a higher power/God. I refuse to take the word of any church at face value. I know it sounds harsh, but in this day and age I see coverups and conspiracies everywhere (I know some are just theories). I do believe in just bring the best person I can be and have tried to pass that message on to our daughters.
" do believe in just bring the best person I can be and have tried to pass that message on to our daughters."
i'm not being flippant when i say, "amen, brother, amen" That's the best sort of religion there is in my opinion.
it's damn hard too, especially for an animal like me.
I've meant to comment on this post since it went up but couldn't decide what to say about it. I've just read Sam Harris's books "Letter to a Christian Nation" and "The End of Faith," both of which are direct attacs on religion in general and Christianity/Islam in particular. I recommend them if you're into getting upset.
I will say this, though: there's a culture war on. It is being waged by the craziest people on the right and left. Any of us in the middle will be held accountable no matter who wins. Scary, right? So with that in mind, all I can say is at least the atheists didn't execute the Inquisitions or the McCarthy hearings.
Feh. Great to be back.
A,
I need to look those books up, although your caveat makes me hesitate. The CSM article mentioned the Sam Harris book and also another, if you've some venom to spare: "The God Delusion," by Richard Dawkins.
And yes, anyone in the middle will eventually be accused of fence-sitting most likely and suffer at the hands of whomever wins. I doubt it will be the moderates.
Post a Comment